When family law overrides what’s on title

The views expressed in this column are solely those of the author.

The title to the property answers the question: who owns this property. Ontario’s Family Law Act answers a different one: who shares its value if the relationship ends. Buyers tend to assume those two answers are the same, and in a surprising number of cases they are not.

The condo that stopped being ‘hers’

A client of mine owned a condo for six years before her wedding. She bought it on her own and paid the mortgage on her own. After the marriage, she and her spouse lived in it together. She assumed that because she bought it alone, before the relationship, its value was hers.

Ontario’s Family Law Act says otherwise. Once a property becomes the matrimonial home, the spouse who brought it into the marriage shares its value. Specifically, upon marriage, the entire value of that condo went into the pot to be shared equally, not just the growth during the marriage as with other assets. Had she signed a marriage contract before the wedding, the outcome could have been different.

By the time she learned any of this, the most valuable planning window had already closed.

Agents meet these buyers constantly: one partner is buying, the other is moving in. That decision may have family law consequences that most buyers have never heard of.

The $150k gift that lost its protection

The second situation comes up just as often: parents contribute a sum of money toward the down payment. Under Ontario law, gifts received during a marriage are generally excluded from division upon separation. But there is a critical exception: if that gift goes into the matrimonial home, the exclusion is lost.

I have seen parents assume their contribution was protected simply because the mortgage broker documented it as a gift, and buyers assume a 70/30 down payment split would translate into a 70/30 split later. Neither assumption is correct. Without a prenup, the Family Law Act’s equalization scheme governs and it does not care whose parents wrote the cheque.

When an agent hears “my parents are helping with the down payment,” that is the moment to suggest the buyers speak to a family lawyer. It takes one sentence and it can preserve six figures, and good relations with two future clients: the buyer and their parents.

The common-law couple who thought title settled it

The reverse problem exists too. A couple who had lived together for four years bought a home registered in one partner’s name only because the other had credit issues. Both contributed to the mortgage and renovations. When they separated, the partner not on title assumed common-law status gave them half. It did not.

Ontario’s equalization regime applies only to married spouses. Common-law partners have no automatic right to share in property, regardless of how long they have lived together. The non-titled partner’s only route was litigation, which is slow, expensive and uncertain. A cohabitation agreement signed before the purchase would have set out exactly what each partner was entitled to, for a fraction of the cost of one court appearance.

With more buyers purchasing before marriage or not marrying at all, agents are increasingly working with common-law couples who believe rules exist that simply do not.

It is not a $10,000 conversation anymore

The most common objection is that involving a family lawyer means a five-figure bill and months of back and forth. That was once true, and for complex, high-conflict files handled by traditional firms, that price point still exists. But the market has changed. Couples today can start with a kitchen-table conversation about what they each want and work with a firm that quotes the full cost of a marriage contract or cohabitation agreement up front. There is a service model for nearly every budget.

What matters far more than where they go is that the agreement is done properly. To hold up, it must be in writing, signed by both parties, and witnessed. To survive a challenge, each party should have independent legal advice and exchange full financial disclosure. An agreement missing those pieces can be worth less than the paper it is printed on. Buyers who understand this early can budget for it the same way they budget for a home inspection.

What this means for you as an agent 

None of this requires agents to become lawyers. It requires noticing the trigger facts when they appear. Ask early whether co-purchasing buyers are married, engaged or living common-law. You will position yourself as a very helpful and knowledgeable agent.

Marriage contracts and cohabitation agreements are not about planning for failure. The government has already planned for that possibility, and the plan is called the Family Law Act. A domestic contract simply allows a couple to choose their own terms instead of inheriting the default ones. The question worth asking is whether the couple in front of you knows which set of rules applies to them. In my experience, most do not.

The above article is not to be construed as legal advice.

The post When family law overrides what’s on title appeared first on REM.